Welcome to the 'New Somerset and Dorset Railway'

The original Somerset and Dorset Railway closed very controversially in 1966. It is time that decision, made in a very different world, was reversed. We now have many councillors, MPs, businesses and individuals living along the line supporting us. Even the Ministry of Transport supports our general aim. The New S&D was formed in 2009 with the aim of rebuilding as much of the route as possible, at the very least the main line from Bath (Britain's only World Heritage City) to Bournemouth (our premier seaside resort); as well as the branches to Wells, Glastonbury and Wimborne. We will achieve this through a mix of lobbying, trackbed purchase and restoration of sections of the route as they become economically viable. With Climate Change, road congestion, capacity constraints on the railways and now Peak Oil firmly on the agenda we are pushing against an open door. We already own Midford just south of Bath, and are restoring Spetisbury under license from DCC, but this is just the start. There are other established groups restoring stations and line at Midsomer Norton and Shillingstone, and the fabulous narrow gauge line near Templevcombe, the Gartell Railway.

There are now FIVE sites being actively restored on the S&D and this blog will follow what goes on at all of them!
Midford - Midsomer Norton - Gartell - Shillingstone - Spetisbury


Our Aim:

Our aim is to use a mix of lobbying, strategic track-bed purchase, fundraising and encouragement and support of groups already preserving sections of the route, as well as working with local and national government, local people, countryside groups and railway enthusiasts (of all types!) To restore sections of the route as they become viable.
Whilst the New S&D will primarily be a modern passenger and freight railway offering state of the art trains and services, we will also restore the infrastructure to the highest standards and encourage steam working and steam specials over all sections of the route, as well as work very closely with existing heritage lines established on the route.

This blog contains my personal views. Anything said here does not necessarily represent the aims or views of any of the groups currently restoring, preserving or operating trains over the Somerset and Dorset Railway!
Showing posts with label Bere Alston-Okehampton line. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bere Alston-Okehampton line. Show all posts

Sunday, May 20, 2012

the old order ...

Watchdog 'worry' on council-run rail lines

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, May 05, 2012
Profile image for Western Morning News
A passenger campaign group has said it is "very worried" about proposals which could see more control over railways passed down to local authorities.
Devon County Council's cabinet will next week examine its preferred options on a Government consultation of devolution of the train network. But Chris Irwin, chairman of passenger group Travelwatch South West, said he had grave concerns over several aspects of the proposal.
He said: "In principle it's a great idea, but in practice I'm very worried about it."
Cornwall Council has already indicated it is broadly interested in the ability to control certain aspects of the train network system, which could include timetabling, setting fares, deciding where investment should be made and, potentially, deciding to reopen stations that are currently closed. The consultation is part of a wider overhaul planned for the country's rail network, after fares were found to be 30 per cent too high compared to elsewhere in Europe. It is hoped decentralisation would help improve value for money.
But Mr Irwin questioned whether funding would still be available to renew equipment and infrastructure, and said: "In this climate of frozen council tax and so on, the answer to that is probably 'no'."
He also raised concerns over what would happen when a passenger crossed local authority boundaries, if it was also passing from one operator to another. And he said: "Local authorities have been slimmed down over the past few years. Have they still got the competence within them to manage these services?"
He said Devon and Cornwall were possible exceptions that could have the expertise, but said: "Somerset County Council is one example where transport expertise has been denuded."
In Devon, the council has previously voiced hopes that devolution could provide an opportunity to progress its vision of a Devon metro transport system which would involve bringing all rail services in the county together under a single brand. It would involve a new service from Okehampton to Exeter and the reopening of the line from Plymouth and Bere Alston to Tavistock.
On Wednesday, the cabinet will consider a range of options, which include local authorities being able to take control of specific areas under a single franchise awarded to one operator. It would allow the council to invest its own money to supplement improvements to certain aspects of the service.
Council officers have said the idea is "workable", but warned that it would rely on a good budget settlement from Government, and that future growth of the network should not sap council coffers.
Another "workable" option is that "micro-franchises" could be tendered for particular areas within the main franchise. But officers have warned that interlinking lines benefit passengers, and so the option was unlikely to improve the situation in Devon.
The Government consultation is part of a far-reaching overhaul of the service, designed to make efficiency savings across the network.

To my mind all these attempts to bring a degree of government (in the broad sense of the word) control of railways is just more interference and meddling by people who simply don't have a clue what they are doing.
Free railway companies from the controls that are currently on them (franchising, leasing arrangements, government decreed fares etc) and they will soon fill the need locally. Businesses like to expand, in the current and permanent no-growth state we find ourselves in railways will be one of the few businesses that WILL be able to expand, along with organic farming, crafts, timber and railway/tramway equipment construction. The market needs to be allowed to operate. The New S&D, forward-looking as always, wants to be the prime example of this new type of business - sustainable, community owned and operated, innovative and inspirational.
Too many people still think its the 1980s, and it's time to put to one side tiny schemes to reopen stations or upgrade routes - nothing less than a wholesale construction of thousands of miles of new railways and tramways will enable us to switch from the Oil Age to the Post Oil Age without huge upheavals.
The most important part of the above article is the (rather obvious!) need to reinstate the Okehampton-Tavistock-Bere Alston line, the biggest no-brainer of all!

Sunday, March 11, 2012

stating the obvious!


A Telegraph article stating the obvious but welcomed all the same. Clearly we're still not getting our message over strongly enough because the S&D isn't one of the five lines mentioned! We'd still love to have someone within the organisation whose sole responsibility will be publicity/lobbying for the S&D. If interested please email me at leysiner@aol.com

The most extraordinary thing that comes out of this article is that some councils are STILL promoting road schemes over rail reinstatement. What planet are they living on? I thought government had abandoned all road development in any case ...

Miles of rail line could be re-opened

Miles of railway line shut under the Beeching Axe could be reopened under an overhaul of the rail industry.

Network Rail engineers work on the track, train track, rail track, transport, travel
Work is already under way on reopening a rail line between Bicester in Oxfordshire and Bletchley in Buckinghamshire Photo: PA
It has been more than 50 years since Dr Richard Beeching recommended the closure of hundreds of branch lines in his report The Reshaping of British Railways.
More than 4,000 miles of railway and 3,000 stations were closed in the decade following the report.
But now disused stations and lines could be brought back into life as the network adapts to shifts in the population over the last 50 years.
The move comes against a backdrop demand for rail travel, which has seen more people using the trains than at any time since the late 1920s.
Currently there are 1.35 billion journeys a year, nearly 500 million more than a decade ago on a network which has barely grown after the wholesale line closures of the early 1960s.
The change reflects both economic growth since the 1990s and a rise in the number of people wiling to commute by train rather than drive.
“It is clear that some lines were shut in the 1960s which should not have been shut,” Norman Baker, the local rail minister, told the Daily Telegraph. “There is a consistent drumbeat about lines which should be open.
“Re-opening lines helps local communities, gets people back onto trains which has economic and social benefits.”
Work is already under way on reopening a rail line between Bicester in Oxfordshire and Bletchley in Buckinghamshire.
Eventually, it is hoped, this could restore the “Varsity Line”, linking Oxford and Cambridge.
Other potential candidates include:
– The Lewes-Uckfield route in East Sussex, providing an alternative to the Brighton mainline.
– The line between Bourne End and High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire which would link the Great Western and Chiltern lines.
– The Okehampton-Bere Alstom link, which would provide a second route between Exeter and Plymouth
– The line between Stansted and Braintree in Essex.
Ministers hope that the Government's plans to cut industry’s running costs will make reopening lines more affordable.
Also plans to devolve control of local rail services to councils will enable them to identify candidates. especially with the Government planning to give them a greater say under how cash is spent.
Under the proposals published earlier this week, local authorities would be expected to fund the schemes for at least three years to prove they are viable, after which the Department for Transport would take over responsibility – subject to cash being available.
The Government’s proposals were welcomed by Stephen Joseph, executive director of the Campaign for Better Transport.
”I think it is now generally accepted that the Beeching report went too far. There are a number of sizeable places that aren't on the rail network where reopening lines and stations would make good economic sense, and there are also 'missing links' between key towns.
“Many of these places suffer from traffic congestion and people really want a choice in how they get around, rather than being forced to use cars.
“We hope the Government will find ways of helping local communities develop reopening schemes, as a first step we'd like to see possible reopening routes safeguarded in the planning system so they don't get built on."
Ralph Smyth, of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, described the announcement as a “definite move forward”
But, he added, “The funding isn’t there and many areas are prioritising road schemes.
“The Government needs to tell councils to come up with rail schemes and change the funding rules to make it possible.”