Welcome to the 'New Somerset and Dorset Railway'

The original Somerset and Dorset Railway closed very controversially in 1966. It is time that decision, made in a very different world, was reversed. We now have many councillors, MPs, businesses and individuals living along the line supporting us. Even the Ministry of Transport supports our general aim. The New S&D was formed in 2009 with the aim of rebuilding as much of the route as possible, at the very least the main line from Bath (Britain's only World Heritage City) to Bournemouth (our premier seaside resort); as well as the branches to Wells, Glastonbury and Wimborne. We will achieve this through a mix of lobbying, trackbed purchase and restoration of sections of the route as they become economically viable. With Climate Change, road congestion, capacity constraints on the railways and now Peak Oil firmly on the agenda we are pushing against an open door. We already own Midford just south of Bath, and are restoring Spetisbury under license from DCC, but this is just the start. There are other established groups restoring stations and line at Midsomer Norton and Shillingstone, and the fabulous narrow gauge line near Templevcombe, the Gartell Railway.

There are now FIVE sites being actively restored on the S&D and this blog will follow what goes on at all of them!
Midford - Midsomer Norton - Gartell - Shillingstone - Spetisbury


Our Aim:

Our aim is to use a mix of lobbying, strategic track-bed purchase, fundraising and encouragement and support of groups already preserving sections of the route, as well as working with local and national government, local people, countryside groups and railway enthusiasts (of all types!) To restore sections of the route as they become viable.
Whilst the New S&D will primarily be a modern passenger and freight railway offering state of the art trains and services, we will also restore the infrastructure to the highest standards and encourage steam working and steam specials over all sections of the route, as well as work very closely with existing heritage lines established on the route.

This blog contains my personal views. Anything said here does not necessarily represent the aims or views of any of the groups currently restoring, preserving or operating trains over the Somerset and Dorset Railway!

Monday, February 27, 2012

things fall apart

Going bussed: economy and tuition fees drive the young away from the car

Sales of coach and train discount cards surge as driving becomes a minority pursuit among cash-strapped students
Passengers board a National Express bus at Victoria coach station
Passengers board a National Express bus at Victoria coach station in London. Photograph: Micha Theiner/City AM/Rex Features
A generation of students facing higher tuition fees and lower job prospects appears to be embracing the mixed joys of budget travel in rising numbers – with the teenage dream of passing the test and driving a car now an increasingly unaffordable, minority pursuit.
Operators report that the traditional staples of budget travel, the young person's rail and coach cards, are being purchased in record numbers.
National Express, Britain's largest coach operator, reported a surge in sales of coach and regional bus discount cards last year, with 36% more being sold year on year.
Train companies said that record numbers of young people now have a railcard: over 1.2m were sold or renewed last year, almost a third higher than the 950,000 who had a discount railcard in 2005. The Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc) said that 18-25 year-olds made over 50m journeys by rail last year, 60% up on five years ago.
Atoc spokesman Edward Welsh said: "We know a lot of under 25-year-olds are struggling to afford the costs of buying, running and insuring a car – and that's on top of paying for driving lessons."
The number of 17-year-olds taking the driving test has continued to fall year on year, as many of them deal with the loss of their education maintenance allowance coupled with a steep rise in university tuition fees. Nearly half of British 17-20 year-olds had driving licences two decades ago, but only 35% do now. Although the long-term slump in young people learning to drive eased slightly last year, the number of under-25s taking their driving test has fallen by over 20% in five years, according to Driving Standards Agency.
Rising fuel prices are dwarfed by rocketing car insurance premiums, which according to AA figures mean young men receive average insurance quotes of over £3,100.
At Victoria coach station in central London, student Lucy Hamer, 19, rolled her eyes when asked about driving. "I haven't learned to drive because it is far too expensive. I have to take the coach up to Liverpool and it's such a long journey, over five hours. The government really should be looking to cut the cost of driving but also public transport too. Every time I get on the bus it feels like the price has gone up."
Motoring organisations believe the economic conditions, rather than the emergence of a generation wilfully opposed to driving, are behind the rise in public transport use by young people. Edmund King, president of the AA, said: "You've got more young people going to university with tuition fees, and they basically don't have money to take lessons or insurance."
He maintained the dream of driving had not died. "There's still that desire, but financial circumstances have blunted the uptake. Despite the environmental talk and all else, I don't think the aspirations have changed that much."
The steep costs may have alarming effects. A recent survey for insurance firm Ingenie found that 89% of young drivers now take less than the recommended 40 hours of driving lessons before passing their test.
King warned of a vicious cycle for the non-driving young: "In times of high unemployment, it's quite useful for people to have a driving licence. For quite a few jobs, that's a prerequisite. And like learning to swim, it's easier the earlier you start. You'll end up paying even more."
If the coach has been the big winner from the age of travel austerity, not all passengers seem entirely enthusiastic, despite the promise of mod cons such as wifi, power sockets and leather seats aboard.
Also at Victoria coach station, Fay Ali, 23, an educational psychology student at Birkbeck, who paid £12.50 on the day for a single National Express journey to Sheffield, said: "I always intend to catch the train and then something happens so I'm left with nought options but to catch a coach. I had a train ticket booked but I missed it."
Alex Vardy-Meers, 25, a tree surgeon hauling his bags of tools, said that coach travel was the one thing that made his business viable. "Any money I earn would have to go straight into the costs of a car. The coach is OK. It would be easier to take a van but I can't afford that. If I didn't have a railcard I wouldn't ever take the train either."
But others have fallen in love with coach travel. Anne Wilkes, 66, a full-time carer for her husband, said it was also their favoured choice for European holidays. "If you're driving, you're low. On a coach you can see a lot more and I'm a nosy person. I like to see into people's gardens."

Carless whispers

Caroline Mortimer, 21, Harrogate, English student, University of Birmingham:
"Certainly the reason I don't drive, and haven't learned to drive, is the cost. I started taking lessons but I lost my job and couldn't afford to continue learning. I've always taken the train to travel between home and university and I do have a railcard, but I'm still forced to travel late at night when it's only £25 or at off-peak times as otherwise it's still too expensive. I can't take a coach either because it's not convenient where I live."
Nicholas Hughes, 21, from London, politics and economics student, University of Leeds:
"Living in London my need for driving isn't great, because the transport links are so good. However, at the same time, there's no doubt that the price of driving for young people – including lessons, insurance and petrol – is off-putting, and that's one reason why I haven't learned to drive. When I used to head up to university I would take the train, but even with a young person's railcard I feel that trains have become so expensive I've been priced out of those too. The coach is definitely much cheaper, and that's always how I travel back up to Leeds now."
Poonam Lad, 20, Ashton-under-Lyne, art student,Birmingham City University:
"I failed my test and it's far too expensive, if you fail, to have to pay for more lessons again. The cost can be hundreds of pounds. I take the train and the young person's railcard definitely makes a difference, and it's popular among students. A lot of students bank with NatWest, who provide the card for free when you open a student bank account. The NUS card is also helpful for discounts on the coach, but I still feel generally that the costs of travelling are too high at any age, not just students and young people."
Saoirse Linder, 20, Rostrevor (Northern Ireland), sociology student, University of Bristol:
"The cost of driving has been a big factor in deciding not to learn, and if you're a slow learner like myself it makes it that much more expensive. In Bristol, parking charges run into the hundreds of pounds too. Why would I drive when I can take a two-hour coach for a few pounds, and my university bus is free? Certainly railcard and NUS cards have an impact in that they are a hugely attractive alternative to driving, although whilst it is good that students have railcards you still have to pay for the railcard or your NUS card in the first place."

4 comments:

Keith Browning said...

It was the bus mafia that caused most of the railways to be closed in the first place. Local politicians often had close ties to local transport firms, garages, car franchises etc, and so this was one way traffic. Marples the transport minister and Marples the road constructor.The connection between the Isle of Wight transport system of ferries and buses and the local politicians is well known.

The Mumbles railway was also closed to feather the nest of the local bus company. There is talk of it being restored, but there is massive political resistance, despite the most horrific traffic jams.

It is not just economincs but vested interest.

Steve Sainsbury said...

I know this article covers buses as well as trains but always bear in mind that buses are also public transport so are rather linked to what we are doing.

Of course any amount of vested interests will never be able to conjure oil out of nothing so unless they switch to electricity AND find a source to charge their vehicles their days are numbered. To me a bus is a tram in waiting and a tram is a train in waiting, all depending on level of use, which can only rise over time. Remember the core of this article was the fact that many students simply can't afford to run a car (could they ever) and that driving take up is falling. That will only get 'worse' as time goes by.

We are also a vested interest, and one that will get stronger over time. We aren't tied to oil like the dinosaur bus companies are, railways existed before oil and will continue after oil. The old order is weakening and the energy crisis has hardly even begun!

I've no idea why anybody, least of all politicians, should be opposed to the Mumbles rebuilding. It would be the best thing to happen to this part of Wales for centuries!

Eddystone said...

The news today so depressing-we cannot keep this up indefinitely. Big business still dictates to the government. We have these ludicrous hikes on fuel prices-what on earth are those in charge thinking about-it cannot go on. Successive Westminster governments refuse to learn from history about the true free market-not the pretend one set by the business barons and their ruthless cartels...and all this against the background story of a failing resource. It is coming to pass Sunshiner-localism and community government is well and truly on the horizon.

Steve Sainsbury said...

We do have to see rising fuel prices as an opportunity. Let's face it, fuel will never be this cheap again. It's no good people whining about tax as the tax would only have to be raised elsewhere and would it be as fair? We have to get used to rising prices, then intermittent supply, a reduction in the tax take and less expenditure on roads. And I agree, it's local and regional initiatives that will bring the railways back, not a government that will be under assault from every angle as things get bad.

None of this news on rising fuel prices should be a surprise to anyone, and we all need to understand that at the moment fuel is incredibly cheap and very reliable - and that the future will get far far worse. The cheap oil simply isn't there any more, and with the knock on effect of economic instability caused by that scarcity, we are in for a very rough ride. This is why it's essential we get our railways back as quickly as possible. The alternative doesn't bear thinking about!